Woody,
Thanks. I had not seen this.
Right off the bat, I can say
a couple of things:
1. Keeping in mind, that it is
a shortboard, at least, the
heel-plate is somewhat con-
toured. The Eliminator was
well-designed, in that regard.
Players, with larger-sizes are
accomodated off the foot-
board, without the large
hump, making each stroke
more comfortable.
2. I do not like that more
narrowed 'tunnel', where the
pedal goes through. Large
style shoes or players that
slide will be hitting the sides,
much like the kind of exper-
ience the DW 9K provides,
with that spring assemby,
on the inside of the pedal.
3. It appears to have a Uni-
Clamp for the beater-shaft
angle and this is really a
standard, now.
4. It is not a direct-drive
pedal. Really a drawback
for me. Direct-drive is the
best, as far as I am con-
cerned, as it allows for the
heel to play its role in
bringing the beaters back
even faster.
5. The cam looks small
enough but I can't really
tell. It does not look in-
terchangeable. I believe
the best pedals have uni-
versal cams or the ability
to change cam settings.
6. The base-board appears
to have a shifting ability
that would allow for the
footboard to be shifted
forward to back, chang-
ing the angle of pulldown,
for the chain. This would
emulate the power-shift-
ing ability of the Eliminator
and it does make a differ-
ence, which many still
are not aware of.
7. The single is not con-
vertable to double. I hate
that. Axis and Trick got
it right, when they made
their pedal easily retro-
able. It's just better.
The description does not
help me much. I will have
to do some research on the
pedal but I am not sur-
prised to seem more de-
signs hitting the market.
It's important for them,
in my opinion to describe
every aspect of the pedal
and why the design is a
worthy one.
They should send me one
to review. lol
Thanks, again, Woody, for
bringing this one to my at-
tention. You know that I
have a pedal fetish.