Yeah! That Gadd guy!!
I am fed up with him sounding
the same, all the time!
I am fed up with him sounding
the same, all the time!
D. Slam wrote:You bring up some very good points, Kenny, but your statement
about versatility can often lead to mediocracy can quickly be taken
the wrong way. The jack of all trades, master of none approach can
definately cause this. But will open waves of creativity if you're gifted
with this attribute. ie Stevie Wonder.
This is all acquired behavior and it comes naturally when someone invests themselves in the process – after all we’re all alive and it comes naturally - unless the person exposed to the environment becomes stubborn and xenophobic.
My role as a drummer is to support what the entire production (and Artist) is trying to express. Other than that, I’m just making noise and should have what Mike Mangini has to sparkle when a solo is provided.
I simply borrowed Steve Gadd’s lick from Paul Simon’s “Fifty Ways to Lose a Lover.”
D. Slam wrote:Hey, rare, you know me.... I'll take another shot!
All metal's roots are heavily in the blues. You can trace it back.
Metal and progressive rock is rooted more in and influenced by classical music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTSjrNtz7j8&feature=related
Jordan Rudess, the keyboard player for D.T. has a strong classical background.
and you can definately hear that in the compositions.
Now, jazz is rooted in the blues which is rooted in gospel, which is in turn rooted
in old negro spirituals. But That does not mean that a blues player can play jazz
or vise versa.
A really great drummer in my opinion should be able to play all styles. Drumming is an art, but don't deny it's not also a business.
In regards to this and the rest of what you wrote previously concerning the Juggler,
fire breather, uni-cycler, etc. These are great points. But I think it's the the example
that prompted Pete's question concerning Tony. Is he not multi versed in his craft, along
with many others who AREN'T getting the session calls? So if this is the method by which
we measure "great" players, then I can boldy say that most of those whom we listen to and
admire are not great at all.
We must not forget that music can be and is broken up into genras. We pick our battles.
Give credit where it's due. Should Buddy Rich not be considered a legendary player because
he decided to specialize rather than generalize? Should a person be considered less than a
great MUSICIAN based on the fact that he or she plays only one instrument or one style
of music?
Like Dave said, there are many variables. And when we ask questions that go this deep,
we should consider as many of those variables as possible before drawing a conclusion.
Uncle John is among the most musical drummers I've heard. And in contrast, there ain't
that many. Like S.G. John has a way of morphing his ability to the music, becoming part
of the musical signature rather than putting "HIS" signature on it. Few, VERY few can do
this.
kenny wrote:
Many musicians changed the face of music forever having never read a note in their life. i'm sure we can name some examples but Earl Scruggs and jimi Hendrix come to mind. What does that say about music? I'm not sure but it is something that can't always be pigeonholed into black dots.
This conversation reminds me of a time an American sitar player cited his guru in the fact that he stayed in his village and taught while Ravi Shankar was out playing internationally. Well i got a little upset with him for dissing Shankar (who obviously had done alot to bring Indian classical music to the rest of the world) but his point was made. It's honorable to keep a tradition alive and it can be honorable to take it out of it's boundaries as well. Both have their place in the grand scheme of things.
D. Slam wrote:
I don't think Id take a gig with Frank Sinatra, him being dead and all.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum