BC's
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
BC's

Billy's Substitute WTJ Forum


You are not connected. Please login or register

Barack for USA President

+10
woofus
fusionfunk
Anders
Niki
Swirler
Admin (Pete)
drumman
Suss
D. Slam
Ted E. Bear
14 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 8]

51Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:48 pm

Swirler



There are two sides to every story. Here is something written by Frances Rice that may be of interest.


By Frances Rice

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: Slavery, Secession, Segregation and now Socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860's, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950's and 1960's.

During the civil rights era of the 1960's, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was President Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Senator Al Gore, Sr. And after he became president, John F. Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Attorney General Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tennessee after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860's, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon‘s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation‘s first goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Senator Barry Goldwater who ran for president against Democrat President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater, also ignore the fact that President Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on January 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only thirty five words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Viet Nam War, President Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Democrat Senator Robert Byrd who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is Democrat Senator Ernest Hollings who put up the Confederate flag over the state capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Senator Christopher Dodd praised Senator Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Democrats denounced Senator Trent Lott for his remarks about Senator Strom Thurmond. Senator Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Senator Byrd and Senator Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The thirty-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970's with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy" which was an effort on the Part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3rd kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29th. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004 blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Bill Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30-40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. Over $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

52Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:48 pm

Colin

Colin

Color does Not come into this.
For many of us.

_________________

Outtasight
Colin.

54Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:24 pm

Niki

Niki

fusionfunk, for you, watch from 2:14 on

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=955Y3NJTRIE

http://myspace.com/nikidolp

55Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:19 pm

fusionfunk

fusionfunk

Niki wrote:fusionfunk, for you, watch from 2:14 on

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=955Y3NJTRIE

Niki,

I watched the video, not quite sure what you're getting at. What I listed in my posts are FACT. They are easily verified. The video had NOTHING to do with what I wrote. Question ??????

Russ

56Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:11 pm

fusionfunk

fusionfunk

Oh, one thing I forgot. A DEMOCRATIC senator, is suing for Obama to produce a birth certificate. Seems no birth certificate exists in Hawaii, where he claims to have been born.

Wonder what will happen if Obama turns out NOT to be an American citizen by birth. Under US law, he wouldn't be eligable to run for president.

The plot thickens.

Russ

57Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:52 pm

woofus

woofus

fusionfunk wrote:I don't normally get involved in political discussions, but if you do some research, like I have, you will clearly see that Obama is a VERY dangerous individual.

For starters, he is financially backed by George Soros, one of the richest socialists on the planet, hell bent on New World Order controlled by the UN, and Obama is his pawn. Obama is in the back pocket of the UN.

Bush may be a lousy president, but at least he had the balls to tell the UN to F##K off. I certainly don't want to live under the UN's control.

Second, he is good friends with Bill Ayers, and even anounced his running for Ill. senate from his house. Ayers is a known terrorist, and one of leaders of the Weather Underground, responsible for bombings in the USA.

Third, he is the most liberal spender in congress, even by liberal standards.

Fourth, he has voted against EVERY anti-gun bill every put before him, and he has stated he prefers a total ban on private gun ownership. Gee, it did wonders for Australia, where the violent crime rate is 4 times higher AFTER they took away law abiding citizens right to defend themselves. That doesn't sit well with me, and I don't trust him as far as I could throw him.

Also, his campaign finance advisor is the very same man that inflated Fanny Mae/Freddy Mac numbers, which caused a lot of the problems we have now, and made 90 million off it.

Not my idea of who I want in the Wight House.

fusion, firstly, you've been misled (lied to) by the McCain folks about Obama having an ex-Fannie-Mae exec as financial advisor. This was debunked a few weeks ago:
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/09/20/ex-fannie-ceo-raines-not-obama-advisor/4

If the Obama administration wants to double funding for UN programs which eliminate poverty (this is the Soros connection re: Millenium Development Goals), then those are tax dollars well spent. This is one world, connected, and we won't have real peace/health without world poverty reduction and environmental conservation. The UN will never have control over your life or your need to own a gun.

And likening Obama to a terrorist through any connection with Bill Ayers just shows the insecurity of the McCain campaign through their winking puppet, Palin. They're grasping at straws at this point.

Lastly, smears such as doubting Obama's citizenship are just absurd.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=76933
Berg of PA is a known nutbar.

santa

http://www.myspace.com/jazzstream23

58Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:05 pm

D. Slam

D. Slam

fusionfunk wrote:
Niki wrote:fusionfunk, for you, watch from 2:14 on

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=955Y3NJTRIE

Niki,

I watched the video, not quite sure what you're getting at. What I listed in my posts are FACT. They are easily verified. The video had NOTHING to do with what I wrote. Question ??????

Russ

Fusion,

I don't know if you've watched the whole clip that Niki posted. But I think the point is: When on the ropes, hit below the belt. And that's exactly what the MCcain campaign has been about as of late. It's like what Joe Biden said: "When you don't have anything to talk about (concerning the issues), then you talk (bad) about the other person."

If you really want to talk dangerous then lets talk Sarah Palin as a very real possibility for becoming President of the United States Of America. She was nothing more than a political strategic choice to begin with. And now that the Palin-mania is starting to fizzle, these are the kinds of UNSUBSTANSIATED, low-blow, smear tactics that John MCcain and his supporters are left with.

More later.

D.

59Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:10 pm

Swirler



Keep in mind the truth is being distorted on both sides.

60Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:04 pm

Admin (Pete)

Admin (Pete)
Admin

No matter which of these two
people get in office, the move
towards socialism as as certain
as the Sun in the heavens.

Both parties contribute towards
this and with fervor.

Socialism has many faces but
its most alluring is that of the
parent, looking to protect a
helpless child. This parent has
not only arrived but has been
here for generations.

It is not far from the truth to
speak of George's power, this
way. Speaking of Soros, now.
However, he has his counter-
parts on the other side and
just as powerful.

Today, they showed their
power in the markets.

It's not about changing the
system but allowing the sys-
tem to change us.

Blessings to all,

https://bcwtj.forumotion.com

61Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:09 pm

Admin (Pete)

Admin (Pete)
Admin

There is hope in this independent
candidate, however:

http://www.tsgnet.com/pres.php?id=370617&altf=Cjmmz1&altl=Dpcibn

His view on the left and the right
encompass the entire spectrum.

I think I will support him.

When you see him, I think you
will, too.

Regards,



Last edited by Admin (Pete) on Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:52 pm; edited 1 time in total

https://bcwtj.forumotion.com

62Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:49 pm

D. Slam

D. Slam

When the Obama capaign began, I was very cautious, even overly so with myself in not falling into that trap of voting for him simply because he is a black man. I received many emails and have had many discussions with friends and colleages concerning this very subject. Early on I would get emails from black aquaintences really pushing me to vote for Obama. I would write them back saying that it is just as wrong to vote for someone because they are black as it is to not vote for someone for the very same reason. I said that I would objectively look at and lsiten to the canidates, see what their policies are and make my decision based on that. I was just recently an undecided voter.

For me to sit here and go through the policies of both canidates would be a waste of time. Many of you have done and can do that for yourself. I have been able to catch all three debates and I must say that in the context of Character and respect of character cocerning the presidential candidates, Jonh MCcain scares me. In the first debate he was repeatedly condescending as he called Barack Obama naive more times than I can count. Not ONCE would he look Obama straight in the eye, even when Barack addreesed him directly. Whenever MCcain would speak, Barack would give him his undivided attention, his eyes focused directly on MCcain even as he would walk to different areas of the platform during their second debate. Whenever Obama spoke, MCcain would stand at his podium, head down, taking notes. And when he would make accusations at Obama he still would not address him eye to eye... Not one time!

While sitting in a restaurant I heard a lady say something that really moved me to thought. Her words to her lunc partner were:

"We need change, and I don't think Barack Obama can do any worse."

The fact is, is that Senator. John MCcain has been a proponent, avdovate of George Bush's systematically failing polices for at least the last four years.

Let me be clear. I was and am a proponent of the US entering Iraq. Though I believe they should have pulled out a heck of a long time ago. I have talked to soldiers that are friends of my kids that have done three and four tours already and they tell me that it's a major cluster-fudge over there in terms of military organization and objectives. One of the problems is the objectives continue to change and the burocrisy leaves the soldiers over there with having to come up with their own things to do. So in other words when they don't have specific orders from the Petagon or what have you, they make stuff up. Their commanding officer will come up with things like doing foot patrols through town to make sure the streets are quiet while waiting for some orders of specifiics from home.

It's crazy...

Truthfully though I must admit that when the US went into Iraq as soon as they did, my question was: "what happened to Afganistan?"

Sarah Palin, I had no idea she even exisited before she was chosen to be John MCcain's running mate. All I can really say concerning her is I think she makes a better hockey mom than a potenial US President.

Again, I personally believe her being picked was nothing more than a strategic political move and the few times she's had to face the fire with Katie and the like during some interviews shows what she really knows. without anything against her personally, she's just a pawn.

When all the dust flew at the time of her being annoounced as the Vice Presidential candidate, it even made some Obama supporters nervous, to the tune of them saying things like: See?! He should have picked Hilary and this would have offset this uprise. And I think this is one of the issues that shows Barack Obama's character. It wasn't about winning or just doing something to strengthen his move toward the White house but picking who was best for the position and who would best represent our nation to the rest of the world.

In a town hall meeting (can't remember where) with John MCcain, a MCcain supporter stood up in frustration and asked: "How did Barack Obama even get here?!" The truth is, Not many expected this. I think it even caught MCcain himself off center.

And then lets face it folks and I won't dwell on it but it can't be over looked. There are some that quite frankly do not want a black man in the oval office. And I must admit that for this reason I fear greatly for Senator Obama's well being. But on the other hand, it's only a matter of time... If not now, then later.


In shutting it down, I just want to give props to ALL the candidates and those that have attempted to become candidates, past present and future.

Somehow, we all know how to do it. We all know what the quaterback should have done, what pattern the reciever should have run, that the guy in the ring should have thrown a left hook instead of a right cross. Everyone of us knows how to fix the economy and restore world order. isn't it amazing what we learn how to do from the comfort of our easy chairs with beer in hand while satring into the boob tube at FOX, CNN and Reuters? We come in here and insult these folks that put life and limb on the line for a better day for their country and some of us here will get all bent out of shape if someone learns the slightest detail of our little lives we've built for oursleves. One person right here on the sight got all bent out of shape simply because another member here sent him an email of simple salutation.

We all know how to do it right up to the point that we're asked to. In the meantime, we sit back in our little hideaways and take cheap potshots at those who will step forward to do it.

Think about it.


In closing:

Thank you Senator John MCcain, Senator Barack Obama, Senator Joe Biden and Govenor Sarah Palin.

And in the word's of Forest Gump:

"That's all I have to say about that."

D.

63Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:01 pm

woofus

woofus

Swirler wrote:There are two sides to every story. Here is something written by Frances Rice that may be of interest.


By Frances Rice

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. .

She's an extremist with a chip on her shoulder. Even her board of directors have resigned.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20080803/ARTICLE/808030351/0/SPORTS0401

Like Philip Berg, an ambulance chaser in need of attention.

Interestingly and also not surprising, she was Suss' babysitter in the early 50s, then became his girlfriend in the late 60s, but dumped him.
He was just too giving for me.



Last edited by woofus on Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:25 pm; edited 1 time in total

http://www.myspace.com/jazzstream23

64Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:06 pm

D. Slam

D. Slam

Swirler wrote:Keep in mind the truth is being distorted on both sides.

There is a difference in distortion, outright lies and making statements without either knowing or refusing to state all the deatails of the matter.

The MCcain campaign as of late has been geared toward slowing or even breaking Obama's momentum. And this is being done with smear tatics.

Democrats Diane Feinstien and Grey Davis tried the same thing when Arnold first ran for Govenor of Califfornia and became very popular in the running. Something about a supposed groping of a women accusation when Arnold was in his early 20's.

They really need to give it a rest!



Last edited by D. Slam on Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:15 pm; edited 1 time in total

65Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:14 pm

D. Slam

D. Slam

Admin (Pete) wrote:There is hope in this independent
candidate, however:

http://www.tsgnet.com/pres.php?id=370617&altf=Cjmmz1&altl=Dpcibn

His view on the left and the right
encompass the entire spectrum.

I think I will support him.

When you see him, I think you
will, too.

Regards,

Pete,

I did this on Billy's site when the forum was up... I nominated uncle John Though. geek

66Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:31 pm

Admin (Pete)

Admin (Pete)
Admin

lol!

https://bcwtj.forumotion.com

67Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:30 am

Colin

Colin

Look at Corrupt Palin today
we now get the real side of that Nasty Bitch.
She sacked a Police man for not sacking the
one Police man connected to a Family Dispute.


She was found:Guilty.

100% Abuse of Power
Fact.


Barrack for President of America.



________________________________


Outtasight
Colin.

68Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:01 pm

Anders

Anders

Usually I don't participate in discussions concerning politics and religion because these are very sensitive and personal subjects. In this case I just want to bring up the age of the candicates and claim that how old the person is, is not totally an irrelevant issue in this context. John McCain is 72 years old and Barack Obama is 47 if I remember correctly. I come from Finland and we used to joke about our eastern neigbour’s, the Russia’s (the former Soviet Union’s) leaders, who in the 60’s and 70’s all were around 75 years old or older. Some of them were senile and many times didn’t know where they were (in which country) doing what kind of decisions. John McCain is most likely not senile, but being 72 years old might be too tough both mentally and physically for this kind of demanding position.

Kind regards,
Anders

69Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:42 pm

Colin

Colin

Great Points Anders

I think you a very correct.


_____________________

Outtasight
Colin.

70Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:20 pm

Woody

Woody

I don't think the age factor comes into play.
Ronald reagan was in his 70's when he became president and became one of the greatest presidents this country has ever seen.
I'd rather vote for experience than a flash in the pan.
Which candidate brings the most to the table.
Besides, the president doesn't run this country, congress and the senate do.
The president is just a figure head.

https://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#!/robertwoodbury

71Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:36 pm

D. Slam

D. Slam

Woody wrote:I don't think the age factor comes into play.
Ronald reagan was in his 70's when he became president and became one of the greatest presidents this country has ever seen.
I'd rather vote for experience than a flash in the pan.
Which candidate brings the most to the table.
Besides, the president doesn't run this country, congress and the senate do.
The president is just a figure head.

Yes, Ronald Reagan was one of the greatest Presidents this country has ever had. And he was elected president at age 69.

I'd have to say though that I think George Bush played a much bigger role than a mere figure head. He is no scape goat for the policies he emplemented. The war in Iraq is HIS baby and HIS legacy alone, not Congress' or the Senate's. In the case of "experience" vs. a "flash in the pan", should MCcain win the election and unfortunately (God forbid) pass on, you'd get the best of both worlds, Woody. scratch

Colin,

You must have a horrible life... I truly and honestly feel very sorry for you.



Last edited by D. Slam on Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:37 am; edited 1 time in total

72Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:27 am

Colin

Colin

Don
you do not know me.

Stick to the thread topic.


____________________

Outtasight
Colin.

73Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:00 am

D. Slam

D. Slam

Colin wrote:Don
you do not know me.

Stick to the thread topic.


____________________

Outtasight
Colin.

I know you about as well as you know John MCcain and Sarah Palin, Colin. And that's enough to understand that you are a lost, lonely and bitter old man.

I figure since you know MCcain and Palin well enough to viciously call them the vulgar, insulting, names you've been calling them, then what I say I know about you has to hold at least some water.

I feel for so sorry for you.

74Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:53 am

Colin

Colin

You are Wrong.

Stick to the Topic.

You are getting Pathetic .

Do not Destroy this Site.


_______________________

Outtasight
Colin.

75Barack for USA President - Page 3 Empty Re: Barack for USA President Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:14 am

D. Slam

D. Slam

Colin wrote:You are Wrong.

Stick to the Topic.

You are getting Pathetic .

Do not Destroy this Site.


_______________________

Outtasight
Colin.

Just so you know, I'm not saying any of this to be mean, Colin.

I just find it hypocritical how you can call people "half dead nutters", and "nasty bitches" here on this forum and then worry about someone else destroying the site simply because YOUR number was pulled. I know that Pete doesn't want this kind of bickering here and I'm not going to get into a insult hurling match with you. But my final word concerning you is this: YOU NEED HELP!!! I honestly hope you find it.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 8]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum